What's New

International Court of Justice to Rule on March 31 Regarding Foreign Nationals on US Death Rows

Posted: March 25, 2004
On March 31, 2004, the International Court of Justice will issue a ruling in a case brought by Mexico against the United States involving 52 Mexicans on death row in various U.S. states. The Court is the highest legal organ of the United Nations and is based in The Hague. Mexico has argued that the defendants are entitled to retrials because they were not informed of their right to talk to consular officials after being arrested, as provided by the Vienna Convention on Consular Rights. Last year, the Court ordered the U.S. to stay the

Minnesota Committee Votes Down Death Penalty

Posted: March 25, 2004
Following two hours of testimony including representatives of crime victims and death row exonerees, the Minnesota Senate Crime Prevention and Public Safety Committee voted 8-2 against reinstating the death penalty, continuing nearly a century without the sentence on the state's books. The Committee's vote likely blocks passage of the death penalty bill this year. Don Streufert, whose daughter was raped and murdered in 1991, was among those who testified against the bill. He noted, “No penalty or punishment can replace our daughter. We find no

Seriously Mentally Ill Man Facing Execution in Texas

Posted: March 24, 2004
On May 18th, Texas plans to execute Kelsey Patterson, a mentally ill man who was first diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia more than a decade before he murdered two women in 1992. After the murder, Patterson wandered around dressed only in his socks. Although a jury found Patterson competent to stand trial, he repeatedly interrupted the proceedings to offer a rambling narrative about implanted devices and other aspects of a conspiracy against him. According to a new report from Amnesty International, Patterson's delusions did not allow him

Study of Potential Death-Qualified Jurors Reveals Bias

Posted: March 22, 2004
In the latest edition of the journal Deviant Behavior, sociologist Robert Young of the University of Texas has reported that death penalty supporters, such as those who are qualified to sit on juries in capital cases, were about a third more likely to have prejudiced views of blacks. Young’s evaluation of polling data also revealed that death penalty supporters are more likely to convict the defendant. When polled, they were nearly twice as likely to say it was worse to let the guilty go free than to convict an innocent defendant. “By allowing juries in

Michigan Lawmakers Reaffirm State's Longstanding Ban on Capital Punishment

Posted: March 22, 2004
In a vote upholding the state’s longstanding abolition of the death penalty, Michigan lawmakers refused to support a measure that would have put capital punishment before state voters in a referendum. The vote fell 18 short of the 2/3 required for passage. During a lengthy House debate regarding the bill, Representative Jack Minor (D-Flint) told his colleagues that studies show crime rates are lower in states without the death penalty. He noted, “The death penalty’s not a deterrent. In fact, the figures would suggest it’s just

Gallup Poll Examines Support for Death Penalty in U.S., Canada, U.K.

Posted: March 17, 2004
According to recent Gallup polls, 64% of Americans favor the death penalty, while 48% of Canadian and 55% of British citizens favor the punishment. Great Britain and Canada have abolished the death penalty. The polling research also examined whether capital punishment has a deterrent effect on crime. Polling has revealed that most Americans do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to committing murder. Gallup's report compared homicide statistics in the United States, Britain, and Canada and the data

NEW RESOURCE: Spangenberg Report Provides Death Penalty Update

Posted: March 17, 2004
The March 2004 edition of The Spangenberg Report includes valuable information on criminal justice reforms from around the country, including death penalty developments. An examination of Georgia’s new Public Defender Standards Council and its efforts to overhaul indigent defense services in the state, results from a Spangenberg Group study of indigent defense in Virginia, the findings of a death penalty cost review in Kansas, and additional state updates from Illinois, Texas, Minnesota, and Massachusetts are among the items

POLITICAL MANIPULATION: Legislators Try to Control What the Courts Consider

Posted: March 16, 2004
Two Congressmen have introduced a non-binding resolution, backed by the threat of impeachment, that would express the sense of Congress that U.S. judges should not consider foreign laws or court decisions in their rulings. The measure, authored by Republican Representatives Tom Feeney

Military Death Sentence Vacated

Posted: March 15, 2004
An Army Court of Criminal Appeals has vacated the death sentence of William Kreutzer, a Fort Bragg soldier who was sent to the military’s death row for killing a fellow soldier and wounding others in 1995. The Court cited a number of grounds for the ruling that opens the door for rehearings on some charges and the sentence. For example, Kreutzer’s attorneys failed to adequately explain the significance of their client’s mental health problems for the panel that determined his guilt and sentence. In the ruling, Col. James S. Currie noted, “Appellant’s

Death Sentences Decline Dramatically in North Carolina

Posted: March 15, 2004
According to District Attorney Tom Keith, death sentences in North Carolina have dramatically declined because jurors are increasingly skeptical of the justice system. Last year, 6 people were sent to North Carolina’s death row, far less than the 26 who were given death sentences in 1999. Keith, who is moving resources away from death penalty cases and to aggressively targeting gun criminals before they kill, believes that a number of high-profile wrongful convictions and DNA exonerations have contributed to the trend toward fewer death sentences. “We’re