EDITORIALS: Death Penalty for Rape Would "Compound the Error"
In a recent editorial, the Los Angeles Times voiced concerns about a Louisiana Supreme Court decision upholding the death sentence of Patrick Kennedy for the rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter. The paper said the Louisiana court's decision to allow the death penalty in such cases could lead states to seek the death penalty for other non-murder crimes, a development that would worsen an already dysfunctional death penalty system. The editorial noted:
The United States is virtually alone among advanced democracies in
permitting capital punishment. But widespread ambivalence about
imposing the ultimate penalty has produced a minor industry of
litigation that has had the effect of postponing executions for years
and even decades. This state of affairs, which frustrates supporters
and opponents of capital punishment, exists even though the death
penalty has been imposed for more than a generation only in murder
cases. Now imagine how clogged the courts would become if states were
allowed to execute individuals for other crimes.
Just that scenario has arisen with a decision by the Louisiana Supreme
Court. In upholding a death sentence for Patrick Kennedy, who raped his
8-year-old stepdaughter and then told her to implicate someone else,
the majority noted that the U.S. Supreme Court "has characterized rape
as a crime second only to homicide in the harm that it causes." That
observation actually came in a decision that invalidated the
death sentence of a convicted rapist. But the Louisiana court held out
the hope that the current U.S. Supreme Court would regard this case
differently. Unfortunately, it's not an idle hope.
In a 1977
ruling, only four justices signed an opinion saying that capital
punishment for rape was always unconstitutional. Justice Lewis Powell
voted to vacate the sentence on the narrower rationale that "death is
disproportionate punishment for the crime of raping an adult woman,"
leaving open the possibility that rape of a child might qualify as a
capital crime. A majority of the current court might be willing to
seize on the distinction Powell drew by upholding the death penalty for
Kennedy. And the justices might be influenced by the argument that
Louisiana's law, which capitalizes the crime of aggravated rape of a
child under 12, reflects "evolving standards of decency." As the
Louisiana court noted, four other states have followed Louisiana's
lead. Texas will join the list if, as expected, the governor signs a
bill recently approved by the Legislature.
The rape of a child
is an unspeakable crime. In its decision, the Louisiana court wrote
that "short of first-degree murder, we can think of no other
non-homicide crime more deserving" of the death penalty. But
imaginative state legislators might easily discover other offenses
worthy of the ultimate punishment: terrorism, major drug dealing (a
capital offense under federal law) or violent hate crimes. Capital
punishment has proved dysfunctional and divisive as a sanction for
murder. The U.S. Supreme Court shouldn't compound the error — and
increase its own workload — by allowing states to execute criminals who
do not take a human life.
(Los Angeles Times, June 5, 2007). See Editorials and Death Penalty for Non-Murder Crimes.
