News and Developments 2007: Foreign Nationals

Presidential Powers at Issue in Supreme Court Arguments in Texas Death Penalty Case

On October 10, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Medellin v. Texas, a case that will determine whether President Bush overstepped his authority by ordering state courts to comply with a 2004 International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling. The case involves Texas death row inmate Jose Medellin, one of 51 Mexican foreign nationals who were denied their right to contact Mexican consular officials after their arrest. The ICJ's 2004 ruling called on U.S. courts to review the cases in light of this treaty violation, but Texas refused to review Medellin's case and he petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for relief. The Supreme Court agreed to hear his case at that time, but before it could be decided, President Bush ordered the respective state courts to provide the review required by the ICJ. The Supreme Court then dismissed Medellin's case to allow time for this review. Texas courts again refused to grant such a review, claiming that President Bush did not have the power to give such an order. Medellin again appealed to the Supreme Court, which granted certiorari and will now consider the extent of President Bush's power to order compliance with the ICJ's ruling. Texas has argued that the Constitution does not give the president direct authority over courts, state or federal, even to have them conduct a hearing. The Bush Administration contends that state courts cannot be allowed to veto treaty obligations and that the president has inherent authority stemming from his unique foreign policy role.

U.S. Federal Court Overturns Scottish Citizen's Conviction and Death Sentence

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit re-affirmed its 2005 ruling that Kenny Richey's capital conviction and death sentence should be overturned because he received inadequate representation at trial. Richey is on death row for the 1986 arson murder of a two-year-old girl who was in his care, an event that he maintains was an accident. Richey is a dual citizen of the U.S. and Scotland, having been raised in Scotland before coming to Ohio.  The Sixth Circuit ruled 2-1 that Richey's trial attorney failed to adequately challenge questionable arson evidence at trial, noting, "The deficient performance of Richey’s counsel undermines our confidence in the outcome of his trial. . . . Confronted with evidence debunking the state’s scientific conclusions, the trial court might have had a reasonable doubt about Richey’s guilt, especially where the prosecution’s case depended on a cast of witnesses whose lives revolved around drinking and partying and some of whom might have had their own motives for implicating Richey."

Supreme Court to Review Case in which Texas has Defied President Bush's Order

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear Medellin v. Texas, a case that will determine whether dozens of Mexican foreign nationals on death row in the U.S. are entitled to a new hearing because they were denied their right to seek consular assistance upon their arrest. The Bush administration and the Mexican government both urged the Justices to take the case after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused to comply with President Bush's order to state courts to review the cases of the 50 Mexican foreign nationals who had been denied their rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. The Bush administration's brief noted that the Texas court's decision, if not reversed, "will place the United States in breach of its international law obligation" to comply with the World Court's decision and would "frustrate the president's judgment that foreign policy interests are best served by giving effect to that decision."

Foreign Nationals News and Developments: 2006

  • Texas Court Rejects Presidential Order in Death Penalty Case

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rebuffed President Bush's order that Texas courts review the cases of Mexican foreign nationals who were sentenced to death without the benefit of their rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.